Evidence mapPaperPMID 39145169Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Patient satisfaction and digital health in primary health care: a scoping review protocol.

Pedro Bezerra Xavier, Ísis de Siqueira Silva, Thaissa Hamana de Macedo Dantas, Rayssa Horácio Lopes, Aguinaldo José de Araújo, Renan Cabral de Figueirêdo, Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Digital Health and Primary Health Care Quality: A Survey Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro Bezerra XavierCenter for Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Ísis de Siqueira SilvaCenter for Health Sciences, Postgraduate program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Thaissa Hamana de Macedo DantasCenter for Health Sciences, Postgraduate program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Rayssa Horácio LopesSchool of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Aguinaldo José de AraújoCenter for Health Sciences, Postgraduate program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Renan Cabral de FigueirêdoCenter for Health Sciences, Department of Collective Health, Postgraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Severina Alice da Costa UchôaCenter for Health Sciences, Postgraduate program in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Using digital health in primary health care (PHC) contributes to reducing costs and travel time, achieving global development goals, improving access, quality and longitudinality of care, and managing health crises. Its evaluation must go beyond the technical-operational aspects to include patient satisfaction, a key element in assessing the quality of care. Objective: To identify and map patient satisfaction (expectations, desires, cultural values) about the adoption of digital health strategies and assess their impact on the quality of care in PHC. Methods: The review will follow the recommendations proposed by the Joanna's Briggs Institute (JBI) manual, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the methodology proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. and will be conducted in nine stages. The search will be conducted in health studies databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and BVS), gray literature, and preprint repositories (Google Scholar and MedRxiv). Two reviewers will select the studies, and the third will analyze possible conflicts. The inclusion criteria comprise studies that have been made available in their entirety, whether they are primary studies or short communications, as well as the following materials extracted from the gray literature: preprints, manuals, government documents, books, guidelines, theses and dissertations. Exclusion criteria include literature reviews, abstracts, books, conference archives, letters to the editor, duplicates and opinion articles. Data will be analyzed by content analysis and inferential statistics. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) under DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/PUJDB. Results: The study aims to understand aspects related to the expectations, desires, and cultural values of patients from different countries, as well as the strengths and critical nodes of the use of digital health on the quality of care in PHC.

Indexed as

Digital HealthPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareHumansQuality of Health CareResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicTelemedicinedigital healthhealth information technologypatient-centered carepatient satisfactionprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39145169
PMCPMC11322341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.