Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39145207›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Encoder-decoder convolutional neural network for simple CT segmentation of COVID-19 infected lungs.

Kiri S Newson, David M Benoit, Andrew W Beavis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiri S NewsonDepartment of Physics and Mathematics, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4470-980X
David M BenoitE. A. Milne Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-6863
Andrew W BeavisMedical Physics Department, Queen's Centre for Oncology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2519-0205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents the application of an Encoder-Decoder convolutional neural network (ED-CNN) model to automatically segment COVID-19 computerised tomography (CT) data. By doing so we are producing an alternative model to current literature, which is easy to follow and reproduce, making it more accessible for real-world applications as little training would be required to use this. Our simple approach achieves results comparable to those of previously published studies, which use more complex deep-learning networks. We demonstrate a high-quality automated segmentation prediction of thoracic CT scans that correctly delineates the infected regions of the lungs. This segmentation automation can be used as a tool to speed up the contouring process, either to check manual contouring in place of a peer checking, when not possible or to give a rapid indication of infection to be referred for further treatment, thus saving time and resources. In contrast, manual contouring is a time-consuming process in which a professional would contour each patient one by one to be later checked by another professional. The proposed model uses approximately 49 k parameters while others average over 1,000 times more parameters. As our approach relies on a very compact model, shorter training times are observed, which make it possible to easily retrain the model using other data and potentially afford "personalised medicine" workflows. The model achieves similarity scores of

Indexed as

AutoencoderAutomated segmentationCNNCOVID-19Encoder-decoderLung CTLung segmentationMachine learningSimple segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39145207
PMCPMC11323195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.