ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2024
Longitudinal associations in dementia family caregivers of ambivalent feelings and disruptive behaviors with C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and D-dimer.
Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal associations in dementia family caregivers of ambivalent feelings and disruptive behaviors with C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and D-dimer.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCaregivers' ambivalent feelings toward the care recipient have been found to be associated with depression and anxiety. There is no research linking caregivers' ambivalent feelings and cardiovascular risk. This study was aimed to analyze longitudinally the effect of ambivalence on caregivers' cardiovascular risk, defined by circulating levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and D-dimer.
methodParticipants were 121 dementia family caregivers who were assessed three times during a 2-year period. Sociodemographic and health variables, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), ambivalent feelings, and C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, and D-dimer values were assessed. Mixed linear models were used to analyze the association between variables, including testing whether ambivalent feelings moderated the links between BPSD and biomarkers.
resultsIncreases over time in D-dimer were associated with increases in ambivalence, older age, female gender, and body mass index (BMI). Increases over time in CRP were associated with increases in BMI, older age, female gender, and the interaction of BPSD with caregivers' ambivalent feelings. The moderation analysis showed that increased BPSD was significantly associated with increased CRP when caregivers experienced high levels of ambivalence (
conclusionThe findings suggest that high ambivalent feelings are relevant for understanding cardiovascular vulnerability in dementia caregivers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.