Evidence mapPaperPMID 39146756Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2024

Treating new-onset cognitive complaints after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: A randomized controlled crossover trial of lisdexamfetamine.

Christina A Metcalf, Chloe E Page, Brianna O S Stocker, Rachel L Johnson, Korrina A Duffy, Mary D Sammel, James Loughead, C Neill Epperson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03187353 (Multi-Modal Imaging of Psychostimulant Effects on Executive Function Post-RRSO), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03187353 phase4completednot on this map

Multi-Modal Imaging of Psychostimulant Effects on Executive Function Post-RRSO

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2017 to 2022Enrolled69ConditionsCognitive Impairment, RRSOArmsLisdexamfetamine, Placebo oral capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina A MetcalfDepartment of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Chloe E PageDepartment of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Brianna O S StockerDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Rachel L JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.
Korrina A DuffyDepartment of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Mary D SammelDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, United States.
James LougheadDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
C Neill EppersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: neill.epperson@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the psychostimulant lisdexamfetamine improves subjective and objective measures of cognitive functioning among women genetically at-risk for cancer who have undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and report new-onset executive functioning difficulties.

methods69 participants were assigned to a randomized controlled crossover trial with 6-week trials of active medication (lisdexamfetamine) and placebo, separated by a minimum 2-week washout in an intent-to-treat framework (clinical trial registration number: NCT03187353). At trial baseline, midpoint, and endpoint, participants completed a self-report measure of executive functioning (Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale). At study baseline and trial endpoint, participants completed sustained attention, attention/working memory, and verbal learning/memory cognitive tasks. Side effects were assessed at 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks for each trial.

resultsFrom trial baseline to trial endpoint, lisdexamfetamine - relative to placebo - significantly improved total scores on the self-report Brown Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (and scores on four of five subdomains) as well as attention and working memory performance. Significantly more participants endorsed side effects across the lisdexamfetamine trial versus placebo; however, trial completion rates were similar, indicating that lisdexamfetamine was nonetheless well-tolerated.

conclusionsLisdexamfetamine improved both subjective and objective measures of attention and working memory and could offer women experiencing cognitive difficulties post-risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy an alternative therapeutic option.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesLisdexamfetamine DimesylateSalpingo-oophorectomyAdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsDouble-Blind MethodExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateCognitionExecutive functionInterventionStimulantSurgical menopause

Identifiers

PMID39146756
PMCPMC11702344

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.