Evidence mapPaperPMID 39147771Full record

ReviewNPJ science of food2024

Current challenges of alternative proteins as future foods.

Yuwares Malila, Iyiola O Owolabi, Tanai Chotanaphuti, Napat Sakdibhornssup, Christopher T Elliott, Wonnop Visessanguan, Nitsara Karoonuthaisiri, Awanwee Petchkongkaew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Substrate Versatility of a Recombinant Bifidobacterial Endoglycosidase:International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Rethinking Plant Proteins: Innovations in Nutrition, Processing, and Food Development.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuwares MalilaNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand. yuwares.mal@biotec.or.th.
Iyiola O OwolabiInternational Joint Research Center on Food Security (IJC-FOODSEC), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6816-9628
Tanai ChotanaphutiInternational Joint Research Center on Food Security (IJC-FOODSEC), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Napat SakdibhornssupInternational Joint Research Center on Food Security (IJC-FOODSEC), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Christopher T ElliottInternational Joint Research Center on Food Security (IJC-FOODSEC), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Wonnop VisessanguanNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Nitsara KaroonuthaisiriNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Awanwee PetchkongkaewInternational Joint Research Center on Food Security (IJC-FOODSEC), Khong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global demand for food is expected to nearly double by 2050. Alternative proteins (AP) have been proposed as a sustainable solution to provide food security as natural resources become more depleted. However, the growth and consumer intake of AP remains limited. This review aims to better understand the challenges and environmental impacts of four main AP categories: plant-based, insect-based, microbe-derived, and cultured meat and seafood. The environmental benefits of plant-based and insect-based proteins have been documented but the impacts of microbe-derived proteins and cultured meat have not been fully assessed. The development of alternative products with nutritional and sensory profiles similar to their conventional counterparts remains highly challenging. Furthermore, incomplete safety assessments and a lack of clear regulatory guidelines confuse the food industry and hamper progress. Much still needs to be done to fully support AP utilization within the context of supporting the drive to make the global food system sustainable.

Identifiers

PMID39147771
PMCPMC11327365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.