Evidence mapPaperPMID 39148018Full record

Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2024

Retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal: a risk factor analysis.

Clément Gisquet, Ndeye Coumba Ndiaye, Chloé Dubroux, Karine Angioi-Duprez, Jean-Paul Berrod, Jean-Baptiste Conart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05647928 (Retinal Redetachment After Silicone Oil Removal), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05647928 completednot on this map

Retinal Redetachment After Silicone Oil Removal : a Risk Factor Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2022 to 2022Enrolled307ConditionsRetinal Redetachment After Silicone Oil RemovalArmsno intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clément GisquetDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Nancy, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, France. c.gisquet@chru-nancy.fr.
Ndeye Coumba NdiayeUMR Inserm U1256 NGERE (Nutrition-Genetics and Exposure to Environmental Risks), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Chloé DubrouxDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Nancy, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, France.
Karine Angioi-DuprezDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Nancy, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, France.
Jean-Paul BerrodDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Nancy, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, France.
Jean-Baptiste ConartDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Nancy, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the rate of retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery and to determine potential risk factors.

methodsRetrospective observational case series of 161 eyes who underwent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery and subsequent silicone oil removal. Pre- and intraoperative risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. We also evaluated the effect of tamponade duration on anatomical outcomes.

resultsThe median tamponade duration was 5.9 [4.3;7.6] months. Seventeen (10.6%) eyes underwent silicone oil removal within 3 months of surgery, with a median delay of 2.3 [2.0;2.8] months. The rate of retinal detachment after silicone oil removal was 14.9%. A history of previous unsuccessful surgery was the only significant risk factor for retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal (OR 4.8, 95%CI [1.5;19.0], p = 0.02). The use of 360° laser retinopexy and concomitant air or gas tamponade during silicone oil removal were not found to affect the redetachment rate. Eyes with silicone oil tamponade ≤ 3 months showed an increased, albeit not significant, risk of developing recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after silicone oil removal (35.3% versus 12.5%, p = 0.06).

conclusionA retinal redetachment occurred in 14.9% of eyes undergoing silicone oil removal following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Previous failed surgery was associated with a 4.8-fold increased risk of developing recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after silicone oil removal. Eyes with silicone oil tamponade ≤ 3 months tended to have a higher redetachment rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID NCT05647928 (12th April 2022).

Indexed as

EndotamponadeRetinal DetachmentSilicone OilsVitrectomyAdultAgedDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVisual AcuitySilicone OilsProliferative vitreoretinopathyRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentSilicone oil

Identifiers

PMID39148018
PMCPMC11325823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.