Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39148069›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Evaluation of a specialist nurse-led structured self-management training for peer supporters with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without comorbid hypertension in Slovenia.

Tina Virtič Potočnik, Matic Mihevc, Črt Zavrnik, Majda Mori Lukančič, Nina Ružić Gorenjec, Antonija Poplas Susič, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tina Virtič PotočnikPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. tina.virtic@gmail.com.
Matic MihevcPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Črt ZavrnikPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Majda Mori LukančičPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina Ružić GorenjecPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Antonija Poplas SusičPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zalika Klemenc-KetišPrimary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe training of peer supporters is critical because the success of the entire peer support intervention depends on the knowledge and experience that peer supporters can share with other patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pilot implementation of a specialist nurse-led self-management training programme for peer supporters with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with or without comorbid hypertension (HTN) at the primary healthcare level in Slovenia, in terms of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness.

methodsA prospective pre-post interventional pilot study was conducted in two Community Health Centres (CHC) in Slovenia from May 2021 to August 2022. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit approximately 40 eligible volunteers to become trained peer supporters. A specialist nurse-led structured training lasting 15 h over a 2-month period was delivered, comprising four group and two individual sessions. The comprehensive curriculum was based on interactive verbal and visual learning experience, utilising the Diabetes Conversation Maps™. Data were collected from medical records, by clinical measurements, and using questionnaires on sociodemographic and clinical data, the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, knowledge of T2DM and HTN, and the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale, and evaluation forms.

resultsOf the 36 participants, 31 became trained peer supporters (retention rate of 86.1%). Among them, 21 (67.7%) were women, with a mean age of 63.9 years (SD 8.9). The training was evaluated as satisfactory and highly acceptable. There was a significant improvement in knowledge of T2DM (p < 0.001) and HTN (p = 0.024) among peer supporters compared to baseline. Six months post-training, there was no significant improvement in the quality of life (p = 0.066), but there was a significant decrease in body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.020) from 30.4 (SD 6.2) at baseline to 29.8 (SD 6.2).

conclusionThe pilot implementation of a specialist nurse-led self-management training for peer supporters was found to be feasible, acceptable, and effective (in the study group). It led to improvements in knowledge, maintained disease control, and promoted positive self-management behaviours among peer supporters, as evidenced by a decrease in their BMI over six months. The study emphasises the need for effective recruitment, training, and retention strategies.

trial registrationThe research is part of the international research project SCUBY: Scale up diabetes and hypertension care for vulnerable people in Cambodia, Slovenia and Belgium, which is registered in ISRCTN registry ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN41932064 ).

Indexed as

EmpowermentHypertensionNursePeer supportPrimary HealthcareSelf-ManagementTraining ProgramType 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39148069
PMCPMC11328385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.