ArticleThe Journal of heredity2025
Individual and social heterosis act independently in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies.
Article in The Journal of heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kinship as a double-edged sword: relatedness among burying beetle larvae enhances growth but increases mortality.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heterosis occurs in individuals when genetic diversity, e.g., heterozygosity, increases fitness. Many advanced eusocial insects evolved mating behaviors, including polyandry and polygyny, which increase inter-individual genetic diversity within colonies. The possibility of this structure of diversity to improve group fitness has been termed social heterosis. Neither the independence of individual and social heterosis nor their relative effect sizes have been explicitly measured. Through controlled breeding between pairs of Western honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.; n = 3 pairs) from two distinct populations, we created inbred colonies with low genetic diversity, hybrid colonies with high heterozygosity, and mixed colonies (combining inbred workers from each population) with low heterozygosity and high social diversity. We then quantified two independent traits in colonies: survival against bacterial challenge and maintenance of brood nest temperature. For both traits, we found hybrid and mixed colonies outperformed inbred colonies but did not perform differently from each other. During immune challenge assays, hybrid and mixed colonies experienced hazard ratios of 0.49 (95% CI [0.37, 0.65]) and 0.69 (95% CI [0.50, 0.96]) compared to inbred colonies. For nest temperatures, hybrid and mixed colonies experienced 1.94 ± 0.97 °C and 2.82 ± 2.46 °C less thermal error and 0.14 ± 0.11 °C2 and 0.16 ± 0.06 °C2 less thermal variance per hour than inbred lines. This suggests social and individual heterosis operate independently and may have similar effect sizes. These results highlight the importance of both inter- and intra-individual diversity to fitness, which may help explain the emergence of polyandry/polygyny in eusocial insects and inform breeding efforts in these systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.