ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Hysteroscopy: where did we start, and where are we now? The compelling story of what many considered the "Cinderella" of gynecological endoscopy.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Music and oral premedication for pain management during outpatient hysteroscopy: results from a randomised controlled trial.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
- The Role of Hysteroscopy for the Treatment of Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Food and Drug Administration Database Secondary Analysis: Difference in Operative Hysteroscopy Device Adverse Event Reporting.Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2025Article
- Perma Curette and Hysteroscopy: An Observational Study About Endometrial Sampling.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Findings in Infertility Evaluation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Concerns the publication: Vitale SG, Giannini A, Carugno J et al. Hysteroscopy: where did we start, and where are we now? The compelling story of what many considered the "Cinderella" of gynecological endoscopy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310, 1877-1888 (2024).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- A Novel 450-nm Laser Technique Versus Electrosurgical Excision for Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: Efficacy and Safety.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hysteroscopy has truly revolutionized the field of diagnostic and operative gynecology. It is presently regarded as the gold standard method for both the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine diseases and it has fundamentally altered the way gynecologists treat patients with such conditions. These pathologies can now be diagnosed and treated in an outpatient setting, thanks to technological advancements and instrument downsizing. Two hundred years of development and notable innovation are now reflected in the present hysteroscopic practice. This review attempts to trace the boundaries-pushing history of hysteroscopy by highlighting the advancements in technology and the therapeutic and diagnostic benefits offered by this groundbreaking approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.