ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Hypertension phenotypes and adverse pregnancy outcome-related office and ambulatory blood pressure thresholds during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-Four-Hour Mean Arterial Pressure and Pulse Pressure Are Associated with Hospitalization Duration at Delivery in Pregnant Women Referred for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Does a non-dipping heart rate profile predict adverse maternal-fetal outcomes? evidence from 24-h ambulatory monitoring in the second half of high-risk pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Does nocturnal hypertension reclassify maternal-fetal risk in women with white-coat hypertension? A cohort study in the second half of pregnancy.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Response to "Comment on 'Morning blood pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk pregnancies'".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Response to "further optimization of morning blood pressure assessment in high-risk pregnancy".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Morning Blood Pressure and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: incidence, anthropometric, hemodynamic, and urinary trajectories in a Colombian cohort.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- A cohort study evaluating preeclampsia risk-based cut-offs for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in high-risk pregnant women. Time for a change?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Optimization of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring during Pregnancy: A Path Toward Risk Stratification Improvement and Management of Hypertensive Disorders.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of outcomes and risk factors for recurrent preeclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) phenotypes, as determined by the consistency between office BP (OBP) and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements, enhance risk assessment during pregnancy. However, diagnostic criteria for hypertension in pregnancy are based on data from non-pregnant populations regarding long-term cardiovascular risks. This study aimed to identify adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs; including maternal/fetal outcomes)-related BP thresholds to refine risk assessment in pregnant women. We analyzed 967 high-risk pregnant women who underwent simultaneous OBP and ABP measurements at an average gestational age of 29.6 ± 8.0 weeks. All hypertension phenotypes were associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal outcomes, except white coat hypertension, which showed no association with fetal outcomes. Using an XGBoost algorithm, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-derived daytime diastolic BP (DBP) thresholds of 81.5 mmHg for maternal and 82.5 mmHg for fetal outcomes were identified as the BP parameters most strongly linked to APOs. Incorporating these thresholds into the BP phenotype-based model improved the area under the curve for APOs and the net reclassification index for maternal and fetal outcomes. Decision curve analysis demonstrated a consistent positive net benefit after incorporating BP thresholds into the phenotype-based model for maternal and composite outcomes. In conclusion, in a Chinese pregnancy cohort, we identified daytime DBP as the most influential parameter for APOs, significantly enhancing the predictive performance of BP phenotype-based models. This study underscores the importance of ABP monitoring in high-risk pregnancies and the need for further research to establish optimal BP monitoring criteria for pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39152252What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.