Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152252›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025

Hypertension phenotypes and adverse pregnancy outcome-related office and ambulatory blood pressure thresholds during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Yiwen Fang, Lushu Zuo, Hongli Duan, Chuanyi Huang, Jiying Wen, Qing Yang, Cha Han, Lijuan Lv, Xin Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Response to "Comment on 'Morning blood pressure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk pregnancies'".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  5. Response to "further optimization of morning blood pressure assessment in high-risk pregnancy".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  6. Morning Blood Pressure and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiwen Fang *Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lushu Zuo *Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hongli DuanMedical Genetic Center and Department of Obstetrics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanyi HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jiying WenMedical Genetic Center and Department of Obstetrics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Qing YangDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Cha HanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lijuan LvMedical Genetic Center and Department of Obstetrics, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China. bangbang10@126.com.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China. xinzhou@tmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) phenotypes, as determined by the consistency between office BP (OBP) and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements, enhance risk assessment during pregnancy. However, diagnostic criteria for hypertension in pregnancy are based on data from non-pregnant populations regarding long-term cardiovascular risks. This study aimed to identify adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs; including maternal/fetal outcomes)-related BP thresholds to refine risk assessment in pregnant women. We analyzed 967 high-risk pregnant women who underwent simultaneous OBP and ABP measurements at an average gestational age of 29.6 ± 8.0 weeks. All hypertension phenotypes were associated with an increased risk of maternal and fetal outcomes, except white coat hypertension, which showed no association with fetal outcomes. Using an XGBoost algorithm, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-derived daytime diastolic BP (DBP) thresholds of 81.5 mmHg for maternal and 82.5 mmHg for fetal outcomes were identified as the BP parameters most strongly linked to APOs. Incorporating these thresholds into the BP phenotype-based model improved the area under the curve for APOs and the net reclassification index for maternal and fetal outcomes. Decision curve analysis demonstrated a consistent positive net benefit after incorporating BP thresholds into the phenotype-based model for maternal and composite outcomes. In conclusion, in a Chinese pregnancy cohort, we identified daytime DBP as the most influential parameter for APOs, significantly enhancing the predictive performance of BP phenotype-based models. This study underscores the importance of ABP monitoring in high-risk pregnancies and the need for further research to establish optimal BP monitoring criteria for pregnancy.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryPhenotypePregnancy OutcomeAdultFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularRetrospective StudiesAmbulatory blood pressure measurementBlood pressure thresholdMasked hypertensionPregnancyWhite coat hypertension

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.