Trial reportBMJ global health2024
The impact of home-installed growth charts and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) on child growth in Zambia: a four-arm parallel open-label cluster randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The decline of child stunting in 122 countries: a systematic review of child growth studies since the 19th century.BMJ global health · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildhood stunting remains common in many low-income settings and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as impaired child development.
methodsThe main objective of the study was to assess whether home-installed growth charts as well as small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) can reduce growth faltering among infants. All caregivers of infants between 2 and 10 months of age at baseline, and at least 6 months old at the beginning of the interventions, in 282 randomly selected enumeration areas in Choma, Mansa and Lusaka districts in Zambia were invited to participate in the study. Cluster randomisation was stratified by district. A software-generated random number draw was used to assign clusters to one of four arms: (1) no intervention (control); (2) home installation of a wall chart that contained a growth monitoring tool along with key messages on infant and young child feeding and nutrition (growth charts only); (3) 30 sachets of SQ-LNS delivered each month (SQ-LNS only) or (4) growth charts+SQ LNS. The primary outcomes were children's height-for-age z-score (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ <-2) after 18 months of intervention. Secondary outcomes were haemoglobin (Hb), anaemia (Hb<110.0 g/L), weight-for-height, weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), underweight (WAZ<-2) and child development measured by the Global Scales of Early Development (GSED). Outcomes were analysed intention to treat using adjusted linear and logistic regression models and compared each of the three interventions to the control group. Assessors and analysts were blinded to the treatment-blinding of participating families was not possible.
resultsA total of 2291 caregiver-child dyads across the 282 study clusters were included in the study. 70 clusters (557 dyads) were assigned to the control group, 70 clusters (643 dyads) to growth charts only, 71 clusters (525 dyads) to SQ-LNS and 71 clusters (566 dyads) to SQ-LNS and growth charts. SQ-LNS improved HAZ by 0.21 SD (95% CI 0.06 to 0.36) and reduced the odds of stunting by 37% (adjusted OR, aOR 0.63, 95% CI (0.46 to 0.87)). No HAZ or stunting impacts were found in the growth charts only or growth charts+SQ LNS arms. SQ-LNS only improved WAZ (mean difference, MD 0.17, 95% CI (0.05 to 0.28). No impacts on WAZ were seen for growth charts and the combined intervention. Child development was higher in the growth charts only (MD 0.18, 95% CI (0.01 to 0.35)) and SQ-LNS only arms (MD 0.28, 95% CI (0.09 to 0.46). SQ-LNS improved average haemoglobin levels (MD 2.9 g/L (0.2, 5.5). The combined intervention did not have an impact on WAZ, Hb or GSED but reduced the odds of anaemia (aOR 0.72, 95% CI (0.53 to 0.97)). No adverse events were reported.
interpretationSQ-LNS appears to be effective in reducing growth faltering as well as improving anaemia and child development. Growth charts also show the potential to reduce anaemia and improve child development but do not seem as effective in addressing growth faltering. Further research is needed to better understand reduced effectiveness when both interventions are combined. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT051204272.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.