Evaluating Microsoft Bing with ChatGPT-4 for the assessment of abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance images.

purposeTo evaluate the performance of Microsoft Bing with ChatGPT-4 technology in analyzing abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance images (MRI).

methodsA comparative and descriptive analysis was conducted using the institutional picture archiving and communication systems. A total of 80 abdominal images (44 CT, 36 MRI) that showed various entities affecting the abdominal structures were included. Microsoft Bing's interpretations were compared with the impressions of radiologists in terms of recognition of the imaging modality, identification of the imaging planes (axial, coronal, and sagittal), sequences (in the case of MRI), contrast media administration, correct identification of the anatomical region depicted in the image, and detection of abnormalities.

resultsMicrosoft Bing detected that the images were CT scans with 95.4% accuracy (42/44) and that the images were MRI scans with 86.1% accuracy (31/36). However, it failed to detect one CT image (2.3%) and misidentified another CT image as an MRI (2.3%). On the other hand, it also misidentified four MRI as CT images (11.1%) and one as an X-ray (2.7%). Bing achieved an 83.75% success rate in correctly identifying abdominal regions, with 90% accuracy for CT scans (40/44) and 77.7% for MRI scans (28/36). Concerning the identification of imaging planes, Bing achieved a success rate of 95.4% for CT images and 83.3% for MRI. Regarding the identification of MRI sequences (T1-weighted and T2-weighted), the success rate was 68.75%. In the identification of the use of contrast media for CT scans, the success rate was 64.2%. Bing detected abnormalities in 35% of the images but achieved a correct interpretation rate of 10.7% for the definite diagnosis.

conclusionWhile Microsoft Bing, leveraging ChatGPT-4 technology, demonstrates proficiency in basic task identification on abdominal CT and MRI, its inability to reliably interpret abnormalities highlights the need for continued refinement to enhance its clinical applicability. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The contribution of large language models (LLMs) to the diagnostic process in radiology is still being explored. However, with a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and limitations, LLMs can significantly support radiologists during diagnosis and improve the overall efficiency of abdominal radiology practices. Acknowledging the limitations of current studies related to ChatGPT in this field, our work provides a foundation for future clinical research, paving the way for more integrated and effective diagnostic tools.