Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155922›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2024

XAI-Based Assessment of the AMURA Model for Detecting Amyloid-β and Tau Microstructural Signatures in Alzheimer's Disease.

Lorenza Brusini, Federica Cruciani, Gabriele Dall'glio, Tommaso Zajac, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Mauro Zucchelli, Gloria Menegaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Morphometric Similarity Patterning of Amyloid-International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorenza BrusiniDepartment of Engineering for Innovation MedicineUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5357-5180
Federica CrucianiDepartment of Engineering for Innovation MedicineUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7258-1463
Gabriele Dall'glioDepartment of Computer ScienceUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-7014-193X
Tommaso ZajacDepartment of Computer ScienceUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-7542-077X
Ilaria Boscolo GalazzoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation MedicineUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-3749
Mauro ZucchelliDepartment of Research and Development Advanced ApplicationsOlea Medical La Ciotat 13600 France.
Gloria MenegazDepartment of Engineering for Innovation MedicineUniversity of Verona Verona 37134 Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-3461

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain microstructural changes already occur in the earliest phases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as evidenced in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) literature. This study investigates the potential of the novel dMRI Apparent Measures Using Reduced Acquisitions (AMURA) as imaging markers for capturing such tissue modifications.Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and support vector machines (SVMs) based on different measures were exploited to distinguish between amyloid-beta/tau negative (A[Formula: see text]-/tau-) and A[Formula: see text]+/tau+ or A[Formula: see text]+/tau- subjects. Moreover, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) was used to highlight the most influential features in the SVMs classifications and to validate the results by seeing the explanations' recurrence across different methods.TBSS analysis revealed significant differences between A[Formula: see text]-/tau- and other groups in line with the literature. The best SVM classification performance reached an accuracy of 0.73 by using advanced measures compared to more standard ones. Moreover, the explainability analysis suggested the results' stability and the central role of the cingulum to show early sign of AD.By relying on SVM classification and XAI interpretation of the outcomes, AMURA indices can be considered viable markers for amyloid and tau pathology. Clinical impact: This pre-clinical research revealed AMURA indices as viable imaging markers for timely AD diagnosis by acquiring clinically feasible dMR images, with advantages compared to more invasive methods employed nowadays.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBrainSupport Vector Machinetau ProteinsAgedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleAmyloid beta-Peptidestau ProteinsAmiloyd-betaAMURAeXplainable Artificial Intelligencetautract-based spatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID39155922
PMCPMC11329216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.