ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2024
Effectiveness of serological markers of gastric mucosal atrophy in the gastric precancer screening and in cancer prevention.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastric Mucosa Cancer Risk: The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment Staging System.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- From screening to surveillance: integrated prevention ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Postprandial gastrin-17 level is a useful dynamic marker for atrophic gastritis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew markers are needed to improve the effectiveness of serological screening for atrophic gastritis.
aimTo develop a cost-effective method for serological screening of atrophic gastritis with a high level of sensitivity.
methodsOf the 169 patients with atrophic gastritis, selected by the visual endoscopic Kimura-Takemoto method, 165 showed histological mucosal atrophy using the updated Kimura-Takemoto method. All 169 patients were examined for postprandial levels of gastrin-17 (G17) and pepsinogen-1 (PG1) using GastroPanel
resultsWe used the histological standard of five biopsies of the gastric mucosa, in accordance with the Kimura-Takemoto classification system to assess the sensitivity of G17 in detecting gastric mucosal atrophy. We also compared the morpho-functional relationships between the detected histological degree of gastric mucosal atrophy and the serological levels of G17 and PG1, as the markers of atrophic gastritis. The sensitivity of postprandial G17 was 62.2% for serological levels of G17 (range: 0-4 pmol/L) and 100% for serological G17 (range: 0-10 pmol/L) for the detection of monofocal severe atrophic gastritis. No strong correlation was found between the levels of PG1 and degree of histological atrophy determined by the Kimura-Takemoto classification system to identify the severity of mucosal atrophy of the gastric corpus. In the presented clinical case of a 63-year-old man with multifocal atrophic gastritis, there is a pronounced positive long-term dynamics of the serological marker of atrophy - postprandial G17, after five months of rennet replacement therapy.
conclusionSerological screening of multifocal atrophic gastritis by assessment of postprandial G17 is a cost-effective method with high sensitivity. Postprandial G17 is an earlier marker of regression of atrophic gastritis than a morphological examination of a gastric biopsy in accordance with the Sydney system. Therefore, postprandial G17 is recommended for dynamic monitoring of atrophic gastritis after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.