ArticleFundamental research2024
Integrating multi-omics data of childhood asthma using a deep association model.
Article in Fundamental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association of Childhood Asthma with the Concept of Exposomics: A Short Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Developing a prediction model for persistent airflow limitation in asthmatic children.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- GD-Net: An Integrated Multimodal Information Model Based on Deep Learning for Cancer Outcome Prediction and Informative Feature Selection.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics and Biomedical Computing.Fundamental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood asthma is one of the most common respiratory diseases with rising mortality and morbidity. The multi-omics data is providing a new chance to explore collaborative biomarkers and corresponding diagnostic models of childhood asthma. To capture the nonlinear association of multi-omics data and improve interpretability of diagnostic model, we proposed a novel deep association model (DAM) and corresponding efficient analysis framework. First, the Deep Subspace Reconstruction was used to fuse the omics data and diagnostic information, thereby correcting the distribution of the original omics data and reducing the influence of unnecessary data noises. Second, the Joint Deep Semi-Negative Matrix Factorization was applied to identify different latent sample patterns and extract biomarkers from different omics data levels. Third, our newly proposed Deep Orthogonal Canonical Correlation Analysis can rank features in the collaborative module, which are able to construct the diagnostic model considering nonlinear correlation between different omics data levels. Using DAM, we deeply analyzed the transcriptome and methylation data of childhood asthma. The effectiveness of DAM is verified from the perspectives of algorithm performance and biological significance on the independent test dataset, by ablation experiment and comparison with many baseline methods from clinical and biological studies. The DAM-induced diagnostic model can achieve a prediction AUC of 0.912, which is higher than that of many other alternative methods. Meanwhile, relevant pathways and biomarkers of childhood asthma are also recognized to be collectively altered on the gene expression and methylation levels. As an interpretable machine learning approach, DAM simultaneously considers the non-linear associations among samples and those among biological features, which should help explore interpretative biomarker candidates and efficient diagnostic models from multi-omics data analysis for human complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.