ArticleHeliyon2024
Risk factors and nomogram construction for predicting women with chronic pelvic pain:a cross-sectional population study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and short-term comparative outcomes of a digital-assisted community-based electrical stimulation rehabilitation program for postmenopausal women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a non-randomized controlled study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Robust forecasting of sedentary bouts in chronic pelvic pain disorders for on-device learning and real-time deployment.npj women's health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Illness Perception of Female Outpatients With Chronic Pelvic Pain.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Non-Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)-Related Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID).Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is a critical challenge. Due to the complex etiology and difficulties in diagnosis, it has a greatly negative impact on women's physical and mental health and the healthcare system. At present, there is still a lack of research on the related factors and predictive models of chronic pelvic pain in women. Our study aims to identify risk factors associated with chronic pelvic pain in women and develop a predictive nomogram specifically tailored to high-risk women with CPP. Materials and methods: From May to October 2022, trained interviewers conducted face-to-face questionnaire surveys and pelvic floor surface electromyography assessments on women from community hospitals in Nanjing. We constructed a multivariate logistic regression-based predictive model using CPP-related factors to assess the risk of chronic pelvic pain and create a predictive nomogram. Both internal and external validations were conducted, affirming the model's performance through assessments of discrimination, calibration, and practical applicability using area under the curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Results: 1108 women were recruited in total (survey response rate:1108/1200), with 169 (15.3 %) being diagnosed as chronic pelvic pain. Factors contributing to CPP included weight, dysmenorrhea, sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence, a history of pelvic inflammatory disease, and the surface electromyography value of post-baseline rest. In both the training and validation sets, the nomogram exhibited strong discrimination abilities with areas under the curve of 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.81-0.88) and 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.92), respectively. The examination of the decision curve and calibration plot showed that this model fit well and would be useful in clinical settings. Conclusions: Weight, dysmenorrhea, sexual dysfunction, history of urinary incontinence and pelvic inflammatory disease, and surface electromyography value of post-baseline rest are independent predictors of chronic pelvic pain. The nomogram developed in this study serves as a valuable and straightforward tool for predicting chronic pelvic pain in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.