ArticleScience and technology of advanced materials2024
Comparative study of the experimentally observed and GAN-generated 3D microstructures in dual-phase steels.
Article in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Intelligence in Stochastic Reconstruction of Porous Microstructures for Image-Based Poro/Micro-Mechanical Modeling.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a deep-learning-based algorithm, generative adversarial networks can generate images similar to an input. Using this algorithm, an artificial three-dimensional (3D) microstructure can be reproduced from two-dimensional images. Although the generated 3D microstructure has a similar appearance, its reproducibility should be examined for practical applications. This study used an automated serial sectioning technique to compare the 3D microstructures of two dual-phase steels generated from three orthogonal surface images with their corresponding observed 3D microstructures. The mechanical behaviors were examined using the finite element analysis method for the representative volume element, in which finite element models of microstructures were directly constructed from the 3D voxel data using a voxel coarsening approach. The macroscopic material responses of the generated microstructures captured the anisotropy caused by the microscopic morphology. However, these responses did not quantitatively align with those of the observed microstructures owing to inaccuracies in reproducing the volume fraction of the ferrite/martensite phase. Additionally, the generation algorithm struggled to replicate the microscopic morphology, particularly in cases with a low volume fraction of the martensite phase where the martensite connectivity was not discernible from the input images. The results demonstrate the limitations of the generation algorithm and the necessity for 3D observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.