ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Morphological and Clinical Characterization of Foveal Bulge Sign Three Years After Retinal Detachment Repair: A Longitudinal Prospective Evaluation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens for Cataract After Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment: A Prospective Trial.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparison of long-term changes in peripapillary RNFL thickness between macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate optical-coherence-tomography (OCT)-morphological and clinical parameters three years after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair surgery and the role of postoperative foveal bulge sign. Methods: Of the 32 initially enrolled patients with primary RRD 20 (14 fovea-on, 6 fovea-off) completed this prospective study. Preoperatively and 3 years after surgery best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT including macula status, central retinal thickness (CRT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), thickness of each single retinal layer, integrity of cone-interdigitation-zone (CIZ) and ellipsoid zone (EZ), and presence of foveal bulge were evaluated. Results: Preoperatively fovea-off RRD patients show significantly thinner CCT, inner nuclear layer (INL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL) compared to fovea-on RRD patients, whereas only IPL and INL were significantly thicker compared to the fellow eye. Three years after surgery this thickening recovered. Final BCVA did not differ statistically significantly between fovea-off and fovea-on patients, no difference in CIZ-integrity or presence of foveal bulge was observed. Presence of foveal bulge at 3 years showed significantly better final BCVA and was associated with intact preoperative CIZ-integrity and postoperative EZ- and CIZ-integrity. The preoperative fovea status showed no correlation to the postoperative presence of foveal bulge. Conclusion: Three years after RRD repair retinal layers show similar thickness. The presence of foveal bulge is associated with better final BCVA. Sufficient pre- and postoperative CIZ-integrity as well as postoperative CIZ-integrity seem to be strongly associated with the restoration of foveal bulge. No correlation was found with the preoperative macular status or BCVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.