ArticleBJUI compass2024
Recurrence patterns following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in a Danish nationwide cohort.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma: Who Needs Adjuvant Therapy?Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2024
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the demographic and clinical features of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) post-surgery for localized or locally advanced disease in a national Danish cohort, with a specific focus on describing recurrence patterns in a subgroup aligned with the adjuvant KEYNOTE-564 trial classification. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the Danish Renal Cancer (DaRenCa) database. Eligible subjects were individuals with an RCC diagnosis between January 2014 and December 2017 who subsequently underwent radical or partial nephrectomy. Variables of interest were demographic and clinical characteristics, rates and sites of recurrence. Recurrence rates were also assessed in a subpopulation stratified using the risk classifications of the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Results: A total of 2164 RCC patients were identified. Most patients (84.8%) had non-metastatic RCC (stage M0). A recurrence was observed in 250 of the M0 patients (13.6%). Patients with a recurrence were older, male, had a higher tumour stage, had undergone radical nephrectomy and had a higher Leibovich score. The majority (74.8%) of M0 patients had recurrence at distant metastatic sites. A total of 392 patients were stratified by the KEYNOTE-564 risk classification: 335 intermediate-high risk, 17 high risk and 40 M1 NED (metastatic with no evidence of disease). Recurrence was observed in 37.0%, 88.2% and 27.5% of these risk groups, respectively. Conclusions: This study elucidates the rates and determinants of post-surgical RCC recurrence in Denmark, underscoring the potential of adjuvant immunotherapy in refining therapeutic strategies, identifying suitable beneficiaries and minimizing overtreatment risks in RCC care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.