Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157169›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2024

Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review.

Veronika S Christensen, Marius Skow, Signe A Flottorp, Hilde Strømme, Ibrahimu Mdala, Odd Martin Vallersnes

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronika S ChristensenFaculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Marius SkowThe Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-1985
Signe A FlottorpDepartment of General Practice University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Hilde StrømmeLibrary of Medicine and Science University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Ibrahimu MdalaDepartment of General Practice University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Odd Martin VallersnesOslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic City of Oslo Health Agency Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-392X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the success of establishing spontaneous micturition following immediate trial without catheter (TWOC) to delayed TWOC in males catheterized for acute urinary retention. Materials and methods: In this systematic review, we included studies reporting success rates of immediate TWOC or delayed TWOC (≤30 days) among males ≥18 years of age catheterized for acute urinary retention. We excluded studies on suprapubic catheterization, postoperative/perioperative catheterization and urinary retention related to trauma. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Open Grey and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was concluded on 30 November 2022. There were no restrictions on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. We did random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: We included 61 studies. In two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), both with some concerns for risk of bias, including in total 174 participants, the relative success rate was 1.22 (95% CI 0.84-1.76) favouring delayed TWOC. In two comparative cohort studies, both with serious risk of bias, including 642 participants, the relative success rate was 1.18 (0.94-1.47) favouring delayed TWOC. One study was excluded from this meta-analysis because of critically low quality. Four studies reporting success rates for cohorts with immediate TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 409 participants, had an overall success rate of 47% (29-66). Fifty-two studies reporting success rates for cohorts with delayed TWOC, all with serious risk of bias, including 12 489 participants, had an overall success rate of 53% (49-56). The certainty of the evidence was considered low for the RCTs and very low for the rest. Conclusion: There was a limited number of appropriately designed studies addressing the research question directly. The evidence favours neither approach.

Indexed as

alpha‐blockerbenign prostatic hyperplasiacatheterizationtrial without catheterurinary retention

Identifiers

PMID39157169
PMCPMC11327489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.