ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Superficial Parasternial Intercostal Plane Block on Postoperative Stress and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Median Sternotomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Narrative Review of Techniques, Evidence, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Extending the Indications for Full Revascularization with Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robotic applications in cardiovascular medicine: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Dark sides and warm rides: Is cardiopulmonary bypass necessary for grafting posterior wall targets in robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass?JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Mini- and Micro-Invasive Approaches in Cardiac Surgery: Current Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Robotic multi-vessel off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) procedure: surgical technique.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-arterial grafting (MAG) with bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITAs) is superior to single internal thoracic artery (ITA) and veins, however, sternal wound infection (SWI) is a deterrent to using BITA, especially in diabetic and obese patients. Sternal-sparing approaches, including robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), may mitigate this risk. We reviewed outcomes of robotic TECAB with BITA grafting. Methods: A total of 871 patients underwent robotic TECAB at our institution from 7/2013 to 4/2024. Of these, 406 patients received BITA grafts and are the subject of this review. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes were reviewed and angiographic patency in those undergoing hybrid revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after TECAB. All cases were performed via a beating-heart robotic approach, with standard TECAB port placement. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 67±9 years and 16% were female. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk was 1.47%±2.2%. Thirty-nine percent were diabetic (15% insulin-dependent) and 39% had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m Conclusions: Use of the beating-heart robotic TECAB approach facilitates BITA grafting to achieve multi-vessel arterial revascularization of the left coronary system, with excellent 10-year outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.