Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157398›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A parameter free relative density based biclustering method for identifying non-linear feature relations.

Namita Jain, Susmita Ghosh, Ashish Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Namita JainDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.
Susmita GhoshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.
Ashish GhoshInternational Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing biclustering algorithms often depend on assumptions like monotonicity or linearity of feature relations for finding biclusters. Though a few algorithms overcome this problem using density-based methods, they tend to miss out many biclusters because they use global criteria for identifying dense regions. The proposed method, PF-RelDenBi, uses local variations in marginal and joint densities for each pair of features to find the subset of observations, forming the basis of the relation between them. It then finds the set of features connected by a common set of observations using a non-linear feature relation index, resulting in a bicluster. This approach allows us to find biclusters based on feature relations, even if the relations are non-linear or non-monotonous. Additionally, the proposed method does not require the user to provide any parameters, allowing its application to datasets from different domains. To study the behaviour of PF-RelDenBi on datasets with different properties, experiments were carried out on sixteen simulated datasets and the performance has been compared with eleven state-of-the-art algorithms. The proposed method is seen to produce better results for most of the simulated datasets. Experiments were conducted with five benchmark datasets and biclusters were detected using PF-RelDenBi. For the first two datasets, the detected biclusters were used to generate additional features that improved classification performance. For the other three datasets, the performance of PF-RelDenBi was compared with the eleven state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy, NMI and ARI. The proposed method is seen to detect biclusters with greater accuracy. The proposed technique has also been applied to the COVID-19 dataset to identify some demographic features that are likely to affect the spread of COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID39157398
PMCPMC11327522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.