ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Osteochondral tissue engineering in translational practice: histological assessments and scoring systems.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design Strategies to Target Joint Resident Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteochondral Regeneration.Cells · 2026Review
- Developmentally Inspired, Mechanical-Metabolic Dual Gradient Osteochondral Constructs Bridging Regeneration and Therapeutic Screening.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteochondral lesions are common pathological alterations in synovial joints. Different techniques have been designed to achieve osteochondral repair, and tissue-engineered osteochondral grafts have shown the most promise. Histological assessments and related scoring systems are crucial for evaluating the quality of regenerated tissue, and the interpretation and comparison of various repair techniques require the establishment of a reliable and widely accepted histological method. To date, there is still no consensus on the type of histological assessment and scoring system that should be used for osteochondral repair. In this review, we summarize common osteochondral staining methods, discuss the criteria regarding high-quality histological images, and assess the current histological scoring systems for osteochondral regeneration. Safranin O/Fast green is the most widely used staining method for the cartilage layer, whereas Gomori and Van Gieson staining detect new bone formation. We suggest including the graft-host interface and more sections together with the basic histological information for images. An ideal scoring system should analyze both the cartilage and bone regions, especially for the subchondral bone plate. Furthermore, histological assessments should be performed over a longer period of time to minimize discrepancies caused by defect size and animal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.