ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of a nomogram of all-cause mortality in adult Americans with diabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality with non-hyperhomocysteinemia: evidence from NHANES 1999 to 2006.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Integration of the systemic inflammatory response index with pulse pressure enhances prognostication of cardiovascular mortality in the general population of the United States: insights from the NHANES database.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model of all-cause mortality risk in American adults aged ≥ 18 years with diabetes. 7918 participants with diabetes were enrolled from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2016 and followed for a median of 96 months. The primary study endpoint was the all-cause mortality. Predictors of all-cause mortality included age, Monocytes, Erythrocyte, creatinine, Nutrition Risk Index (NRI), neutrophils/lymphocytes (NLR), smoking habits, alcohol consumption, cardiovascular disease (CVD), urinary albumin excretion rate (UAE), and insulin use. The c-index was 0.790 (95% CI 0.779-0.801, P < 0.001) and 0.792 (95% CI: 0.776-0.808, P < 0.001) for the training and validation sets, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.815, 0.814, 0.827 and 0.812, 0.818 and 0.829 for the training and validation sets at 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up, respectively. Both calibration plots and DCA curves performed well. The model provides accurate predictions of the risk of death for American persons with diabetes and its scores can effectively determine the risk of death in outpatients, providing guidance for clinical decision-making and predicting prognosis for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.