ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Development and validation of the UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitative determination of 25 PFAS in dried blood spots.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of a capillary blood collection device to monitor exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Veterans living in proximity to potential sources of environmental contamination.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Establishment and application of a QuEChERS-based high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the analysis of 56 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in human plasma.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Regulating the surface chemistry of covalent organic frameworks for enhancement cationic dye removal and identification.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are anthropogenic fluorine-containing compounds largely used in industrial and consumer applications. They tend to bioaccumulate in the human body after intake from various sources in daily life. Following repeated exposure to PFAS, a broad range of adverse health outcomes has been reported. Consequently, monitoring PFAS levels in human blood is of paramount importance for public health policies. In contrast with traditional venipuncture, dried blood spots (DBS) constitute a reliable, cheap, and less invasive technique to allow microsampling by capillary blood collected on a specific device. This work aimed to develop and validate an innovative analytical method, combining quantitative DBS with UHPLC-MS/MS instrumentation to identify and quantify 25 PFAS. The extraction procedure was developed and optimized within the range 2-100 ng/mL. Specifically, fortified blood was applied on Capitainer®B devices providing 10 μL of blood volume through a microfluidic channel. After 3 h of drying, the extraction was performed by methanol under sonication, followed by centrifugation. Then, the extraction solvent was evaporated; the residue was reconstituted with the mobile phase solution. The validated method evidenced good sensitivity, with limits of detection ranging from 0.4 ng/mL (PFODA, PFOS) to 1.0 ng/mL (PFOA, 3,6-OPFHpA). The ± 20% acceptability criteria established for intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were fulfilled for all analytes. High recovery-above 80%-was recorded, whereas significant matrix effect resulted in ion enhancement (> 50%) for 13 analytes. In conclusion, the proposed workflow proved to be reliable, fit for purpose, and easily adaptable in the laboratory routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.