Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160569›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Challenges in institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for health service packages: a qualitative document and interview analysis from Iran.

Haniye Sadat Sajadi, Hamidreza Safikhani, Alireza Olyaeemanesh, Reza Majdzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haniye Sadat SajadiKnowledge Utilization Research Center, University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-4080
Hamidreza SafikhaniIranian Health Economics Association, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5459-1326
Alireza OlyaeemaneshNational Institute of Health Research and Health Equity Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-2417
Reza MajdzadehSchool of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom. reza.majdzadeh@essex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-4470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSetting and implementing evidence-informed health service packages (HSPs) is crucial for improving health and demonstrating the effective use of evidence in real-world settings. Despite extensive training for large groups on evidence generation and utilization and establishing structures such as evidence-generation entities in many countries, the institutionalization of setting and implementing evidence-informed HSPs remains unachieved. This study aims to review the actions taken to set the HSP in Iran and to identify the challenges of institutionalizing the evidence-informed priority-setting process.

methodsRelevant documents were obtained through website search, Google queries, expert consultations and library manual search. Subsequently, we conducted nine qualitative semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. The participants were purposively sampled to represent diverse backgrounds relevant to health policymaking and financing. These interviews were meticulously audio-recorded, transcribed and reviewed. We employed the framework analysis approach, guided by the Kuchenmüller et al. framework, to interpret data.

resultsEfforts to incorporate evidence-informed process in setting HSP in Iran began in the 1970s in the pilot project of primary health care. These initiatives continued through the Health Transformation Plan in 2015 and targeted disease-specific efforts in 2019 in recent years. However, full institutionalization remains a challenge. The principal challenges encompass legal gaps, methodological diversity, fragile partnerships, leadership changeovers, inadequate financial backing of HSP and the dearth of an accountability culture. These factors impede the seamless integration and enduring sustainability of evidence-informed practices, hindering collaborative decision-making and optimal resource allocation.

conclusionsTechnical aspects of using evidence for policymaking alone will not ensure sustainability unless it achieves the necessary requirements for institutionalization. While addressing all challenges is crucial, the primary focus should be on required transparency and accountability, public participation with an intersectionality lens and making this process resilience to shocks. It is imperative to establish a robust legal framework and a strong and sustainable political commitment to embrace and drive change, ensuring sustainable progress.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth PrioritiesPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineEvidence-Based PracticeHealth ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicIranPrimary Health CareBenefits packageEvidence-based practiceHealth financingHealth policyKnowledge translationUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID39160569
PMCPMC11331597

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.