ArticleCurrent drug metabolism2024
A Cross-sectional Comparative Analysis of Eleven Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Docetaxel in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients.
Article in Current drug metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVarious population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models have been established to help determine the appropriate dosage of docetaxel, however, no clear consensus on optimal dosing has been achieved. The purpose of this study is to perform an external evaluation of published models in order to test their predictive performance, and to find an appropriate PPK model for Chinese breast cancer patients.
methodsA systematic literature search of docetaxel PPK models was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases. The predictive performance of eleven identified models was evaluated using prediction-based and simulation-based diagnostics on an independent dataset (112 docetaxel concentrations from 56 breast cancer patients). The -2×log (likelihood) and Akaike information criterion were also calculated to evaluate model fit.
resultsThe median prediction error of eight of the eleven models was less than 10%. The model fitting results showed that the three-compartment model of Bruno et al. had the best prediction performance and that the three compartment model of Wang et al. had the best simulation effect. Furthermore, although the covariates that significantly affect PK parameters were different between them, seven models demonstrated that docetaxel PK parameters were influenced by liver function.
conclusionsThree compartment PPK models may be predictive of optimal docetaxel dosage for Chinese breast cancer patients. However, for patients with impaired liver function, the choice of which model to use to predict the blood concentration of docetaxel still requires great care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.