ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2024
A comparison of wild boar and domestic pig microbiota does not reveal a loss of microbial species but an increase in alpha diversity and opportunistic genera in domestic pigs.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Gut Microbiota Composition and Occurrence of Selected Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Domestic Pigs and Urban and Sylvatic Wild Boars from Sicily.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiome Diversity, Stability, and Predicted Function in Captive Guanacos (Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Metagenomic insights into the global wild boar faecal microbiome reveal novel taxa and carbohydrate degraders distinguishing wild and domesticated Sus.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Single-nucleus transcriptome profiling of wild boar and domestic pig intestines reveals the spatiotemporal dynamics of immunity and nutrient absorption.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Uniqueness of Companion Animal Fecal Microbiota: Convergence Patterns Between Giant Pandas, Red Pandas, and Domesticated Animals.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- From forest to farm: the impact of a broad spectrum of lifestyles on the porcine gut microbiota.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Perspectives in porcine semen conservation (liquid and frozen).The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Impact of Organic and Conventional Husbandry Systems on the Gut Microbiome and Resistome in Pigs.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in pigs: current status and future perspective.Animal microbiome · 2025Review
- Complete Genome and Characterization Analysis of aMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Growth Performance, Carcass Quality and Gut Microbiome of Finishing Stage Pigs Fed Formulated Protein-Energy Nutrients Balanced Diet with Banana Agro-Waste Silage.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of wild-boar-derived microbiota transplantation on piglet microbiota, metabolite profile, and gut proinflammatory cytokine production differs from sow-derived microbiota.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Consequences of Domestication on Gut Microbiome: A Comparative Analysis Between Wild Boars and Domestic Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Impact of sample multiplexing on detection of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes in pig microbiomes using long-read sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Topological and spatial heterogeneity of gut microbiota co-abundance networks in pigs revealed by using large-scale samples.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The microbiome of wild animals is believed to be co-evolved with host species, which may play an important role in host physiology. It has been hypothesized that the rigorous hygienic practices in combination with antibiotics and diets with simplified formulas used in the modern swine industry may negatively affect the establishment and development of the gut microbiome. In this study, we evaluated the fecal microbiome of 90 domestic pigs sampled from nine farms in Canada and 39 wild pigs sampled from three different locations on two continents (North America and Europe) using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Surprisingly, the gut microbiome in domestic pigs exhibited higher alpha-diversity indices than wild pigs ( IMPORTANCE: The microbiome of pigs plays a crucial role in shaping host physiology and health. This study sought to identify if domestication and current rearing practices have resulted in a loss of co-evolved bacterial species by comparing the microbiome of wild boar and conventionally raised pigs. It provides a comparison of domestic and wild pigs with the largest sample sizes and is the first to examine wild boars from multiple sites and continents. We were able to identify core microbiome members that were shared between wild and domestic populations, and on the contrary to expectation, few microbes were identified to be lost from wild boar. Nevertheless, the microbiome of wild boars had a lower abundance of important pathogenic genera and was distinct from domestic pigs. The differences in the microbial composition may identify an opportunity to shift the microbial community of domestic pigs towards that of wild boar with the intent to reduce pathogen load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.