Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39163034›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Extent and Topography of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits Associate With Rod-Mediated Vision in Aging and AMD: ALSTAR2 Baseline.

Lukas Goerdt, Mohymina Amjad, Thomas A Swain, Gerald McGwin, Mark E Clark, Cynthia Owsley, Kenneth R Sloan, Christine A Curcio, Deepayan Kar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impaired Rod-Mediated Vision is the Functional Hallmark of Ageing and Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reply.Ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lukas GoerdtDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Mohymina AmjadDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Thomas A SwainDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Gerald McGwinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Mark E ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Cynthia OwsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Kenneth R SloanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Christine A CurcioDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Deepayan KarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Paul Douglas Gamlin · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
Functionally Validated Structural Endpoints for Early AMDR01EY029595 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CURCIO, CHRISTINE A, OWSLEY, CYNTHIA · 2019 to 2023
$4.1M
A hyperspectral approach to RPE fluorophores in AMDR01EY027948 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ACH, THOMAS, CURCIO, CHRISTINE A · 2017 to 2025
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027948NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In AMD, rod-mediated dark adaptation (RMDA) at 5° eccentricity is slower in eyes with subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) than in eyes without. Here we quantified SDD burden using supervised deep learning for comparison to vision and photoreceptor topography. Methods: In persons ≥60 years from the Alabama Study on Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration 2, normal, early AMD, and intermediate AMD eyes were classified by the AREDS nine-step system. A convolutional neural network was trained on 55°-wide near-infrared reflectance images for SDD segmentation. Trained graders annotated ground truth (SDD yes/no). Predicted and true datasets agreed (Dice coefficient, 0.92). Inference was manually proofread using optical coherence tomography. The mean SDD area (mm2) was compared among diagnostic groups (linear regression) and to vision (age-adjusted Spearman correlations). Fundus autofluorescence images were used to mask large vessels in SDD maps. Results: In 428 eyes of 428 persons (normal, 218; early AMD, 120; intermediate AMD, 90), the mean SDD area differed by AMD severity (P < 0.0001): 0.16 ± 0.87 (normal), 2.48 ± 11.23 (early AMD), 11.97 ± 13.33 (intermediate AMD). Greater SDD area was associated with worse RMDA (r = 0.27; P < 0.0001), mesopic (r = -0.13; P = 0.02) and scotopic sensitivity (r = -0.17; P < 0.001). SDD topography peaked at 5° superior, extended beyond the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid and optic nerve, then decreased. Conclusions: SDD area is associated with degraded rod-mediated vision. RMDA 5° (superior retina) probes where SDD is maximal, closer to the foveal center than the rod peak at 3 to 6 mm (10.4°-20.8°) superior and the further eccentric peak of rod:cone ratio. Topographic data imply that factors in addition to rod density influence SDD formation.

Indexed as

Dark AdaptationMacular DegenerationRetinal DrusenRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overAgingDeep LearningFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39163034
PMCPMC11343004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.