Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39164033›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

How is social support defined, categorized and measured in studies of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses: A scoping review.

Enobong Gideon Asuquo, Sylvia Murphy-Tighe, Ruth Ryan, Kieran O'Sullivan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Enobong Gideon AsuquoDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-8590
Sylvia Murphy-TigheDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-2184
Ruth RyanDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-412X
Kieran O'SullivanHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-3125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo summarize current literature on the definition, categorization and measurement of social support in studies of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital nurses.

designA scoping review. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase and Web of Science) was employed to map the evidence between January 2012 and April 2023 on the definition, categorization and measurement of social support in studies of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in hospital settings. REVIEW

methodsThis review adopted Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews. Data extraction was reported using PRISMA Scoping Review guidelines and articles synthesized using a descriptive approach.

resultsFifteen studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review. Social support was distinctly defined in only two studies. Four main categories of social support identified were Co-worker, Supervisor, Family and Overall support. Eight tools were found to measure social support, and the most used tool was the Job Content Questionnaire.

conclusionsThe review identified that social support is often not explicitly defined. Furthermore, social support can be categorized and measured in different ways, using diverse tools. This variation may affect the understanding of social support and the approaches in measuring and providing social support in the workplace. IMPACT: Studies should clearly define the social support category evaluated, to facilitate comparisons between studies of nurses with work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Healthcare managers should obtain feedback from nurses to ensure that the category of social support provided matches that which the nurse requires to ensure it helps the nurse from an organizational perspective. Healthy social relationships should be encouraged among nurses to promote nurses' well-being and by extension patient care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no patient or public involvement.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesNursing Staff, HospitalOccupational DiseasesSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkplacehospitalmeasurementmusculoskeletal disordersnursenursingpainrelationshipssocial supportwell‐beingworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39164033
PMCPMC11810495

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.