ReviewJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal cystic lesions: an update.
Review in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic evaluation of renal masses in chronic kidney disease: a clinical and radiologic challenge.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- A contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pseudocapsule status in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Prognostic evaluation of retinal reattachment surgery: predictive efficacy analysis of microperfusion indices via contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- CEUS in Atypical Renal Cystic Masses: How, When and Why.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Imaging Assessment of Complex Renal Cysts: Comparative Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the follow-up of Bosniak IIF cystic renal lesions.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation and management of solid renal lesions based on EFSUMB guidelines.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review aims to describe the current status of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing renal cystic lesion. The imaging techniques usually performed for their evaluation are ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with different criteria of application based on the individual case and the purpose of the examination. Generally, US, as a non-ionizing examination, is the first imaging modality performed and therefore the one that incidentally detects cystic lesions. CT is the most performed imaging modality for cystic lesion assessment before MRI evaluation. It provides better characterization and management and has been introduced into the Bosniak classification. In this context, CEUS is making its way for its characteristics and represents the emerging technique in this field. With these premises, the authors analyze the role of CEUS in the evaluation of renal cysts, starting with an explanation of the technique, describe its main advantages and limitations, and end with a discussion of its application in the Bosniak classification and management, following the current major guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.