ArticleBMC public health2024
The effect of long-term care insurance on women's health outcomes in China: evidence from a disability inclusion action.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The effect of long-term care insurance on health outcomes and medical services utilization: based on an analysis of moderating effect of disability.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-term care insurance (LTCI) in China provides financial and care security for persons with disabilities and includes caregivers in the paid labour workforce. However, it is unclear how the LTCI affects health outcomes in female recipients, female caregivers, and female non-recipients and female non-caregivers.
methodsUsing the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study data and staggered difference-in-differences method, we evaluated the effect of LTCI on health outcomes in women with different roles, including female recipients, female caregivers, and female non-recipients and female non-caregivers, and discussed the heterogeneity of the effect on women's health outcomes.
resultsLTCI statistically significant increased self-rated health and reduced depression in women and improved the health in women with different roles by increasing self-rated health in female recipients, reducing chronic diseases in female caregivers, and reducing depression in female non-recipients and female non-caregivers. There was a more pronounced improvement in health outcomes among women in the west and northeast and women in rural village.
conclusionsAfter the implementation of LTCI, health outcomes in female recipients, female caregivers, and female non-recipients and female non-caregivers were improved. LTCI' improvement on women's health outcomes was heterogeneous geographically and socially. Our findings highlight the importance of delivering differentiated health interventions for women with different roles in the implementation process of LTCI and minimizing women's health inequalities in geography and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.