Evidence mapPaperPMID 39165159Full record

SynthesisClinical and molecular hepatology2024

Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Young Eun Chon, Young-Joo Jin, Jihyun An, Hee Yeon Kim, Miyoung Choi, Dae Won Jun, Mi Na Kim, Ji Won Han, Han Ah Lee, Jung Hwan Yu and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Young Eun ChonDepartment of Gastroenterology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Young-Joo JinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Jihyun AnDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Hee Yeon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Miyoung ChoiDivision of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Na KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Won HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Han Ah LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Hwan YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Seung Up KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsOpinions differ regarding vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (VCTE/MRE) cut-offs for diagnosing advanced fibrosis (AF) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of VCTE and MRE for diagnosing AF.

methodsLiterature databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed, were used to identify relevant studies published up to June 13, 2023. We selected studies evaluating VCTE and MRE regarding the degree of liver fibrosis using liver biopsy as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) of the pooled data for VCTE and MRE for each fibrosis stage and optimal cut-offs for AF were investigated.

resultsA total of 19,199 patients from 63 studies using VCTE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.86), 0.83 (0.80-0.86), 0.87 (0.84-0.90), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. Similarly, 1,484 patients from 14 studies using MRE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.89 (0.86-0.92), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 0.89 (0.86-0.92), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. The diagnostic AUC for AF using VCTE was highest at 0.90 with a cut-off of 7.1-7.9 kPa, and that of MRE was highest at 0.94 with a cut-off of 3.62-3.8 kPa.

conclusionVCTE (7.1-7.9 kPa) and MRE (3.62-3.8 kPa) with the suggested cut-offs showed favorable accuracy for diagnosing AF in patients with NAFLD. This result will serve as a basis for clinical guidelines for non-invasive tests and differential diagnosis of AF.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesLiverLiver CirrhosisNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseArea Under CurveHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingROC CurveVibrationAdvanced fibrosisMagnetic resonance elastographyMeta-analysisNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseVibration-controlled transient elastography

Identifiers

PMID39165159
PMCPMC11493355

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.