Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39165367›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Tolerability of Current Treatments for Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Approved and Investigational Therapies.

Preeya K Gupta, Rolando Toyos, John D Sheppard, Melissa Toyos, Francis S Mah, Brian Bird, Pamela E Theriot, Don Higgins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances and future challenges in nanosystems for ocular drug delivery.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Preeya K GuptaTriangle Eye Consultants, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0895-7870
Rolando ToyosToyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA.
John D SheppardVirginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Melissa ToyosToyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-9643
Francis S MahScripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brian BirdDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Pamela E TheriotLusk Eye Specialists, Shreveport, LA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7924-6672
Don HigginsDry Eye Treatment Center of Connecticut, Plainville, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common, multifactorial ocular disease impacting 5% to 20% of people in Western countries and 45% to 70% in Asian countries. Despite the prevalence of DED and the number of treatment approaches available, signs and symptoms of the disease continue to limit the quality of life for many patients. Standard over-the-counter treatment approaches and behavior/environmental modifications may help some cases but more persistent forms often require pharmacological interventions. Approved and investigational pharmaceutical approaches attempt to treat the signs and symptoms of DED in different ways and tend to have varying tolerability among patients. While several pharmacological approaches are the standard for persistent and severe disease, mechanical options provide alternate treatment modalities that attempt to balance efficacy and comfort. Newer approaches target the causes of DED, utilizing novel delivery methods to minimize irritation and adverse events. Here, we review approved and investigational approaches to treating DED and compare patient tolerability.

Indexed as

dry eye diseasemechanical interventionspharmaceutical interventionssafetytolerability

Identifiers

PMID39165367
PMCPMC11334916

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.