Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39166637›Full record

SynthesisRevista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica2024

Effects of aerobic exercise on components of the metabolic syndrome in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mercedes Miranda-Tueros, Joshua Ramirez-Peña, Miguel Cabanillas-Lazo, José Luis Paz-Ibarra, Isabel Pinedo-Torres

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Position Statement on Cardiometabolic Health Across the Woman's Life Course - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mercedes Miranda-TuerosUniversidad Científica del Sur, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-6497
Joshua Ramirez-PeñaUniversidad Científica del Sur, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-4949
Miguel Cabanillas-LazoRed de Eficacia Clínica y Sanitaria, REDECS, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-0530
José Luis Paz-IbarraFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-3727
Isabel Pinedo-TorresGrupo de Investigación NEURONECS: Neurociencia, efectividad clínica y salud pública, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-5103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE.: To determine the effects of aerobic exercise on the components of the metabolic syndrome in older adult diabetic patients by means of a systematic review with meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: We used the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, Web of Science databases and the Google Scholar search engine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently determined whether studies met the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2). Quantitative analyses were performed in R v 4.0.5, using random effects. RESULTS.: We identified 8697 studies, of which 7 RCTs were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most studies were assessed as having a high or low RoB in at least three domains. Meta-analysis showed that aerobic exercise was effective in improving glucose levels (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.04; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.27, -0.81), systolic blood pressure (SMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.56), diastolic blood pressure (SMD: -0.75; 95% CI: -0.98, -0.52), glycosylated hemoglobin (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.77, -0.37), HDL (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.55), triglycerides (SMD: -0.26, 95% CI: -0.47, -0.06). No significant adverse effects were reported. The level of certainty of the results was low for fasting glucose, moderate for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and very low for the other outcomes, in addition to few adverse effects. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the use of surrogate markers. CONCLUSIONS.: Aerobic exercise was shown to have a significant improvement in the components of the metabolic syndrome in older diabetic adults, and no major adverse effects were reported. However, we recommend more RCTs with longer intervention time to establish the impact on symptoms and complications. Motivation for the study. The motivation for this research arises from the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus around the world. Despite their impact, there is a gap in knowledge regarding non-pharmacological interventions in older adults aimed at improving the metabolic profile of these patients. Main findings. Our results show a significant improvement in glucose, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, HDL, and triglyceride levels after the aerobic exercise intervention. In addition, no significant adverse effects were observed. Public health implications. Physical exercise is an affordable and globally available strategy. It improves the metabolic profile of older adult patients with metabolic syndrome.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseMetabolic SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedHumans

Identifiers

PMID39166637
PMCPMC11300696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.