Evidence mapPaperPMID 39167190Full record

ArticleInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Drug therapy of type-2-diabetes-is metformin dispensable now?]

Baptist Gallwitz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Baptist GallwitzDeutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (DDG), Albrechtstr. 9, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. gallwitz@ddg.info.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metformin has been recommended as first-line pharmacological therapy in type‑2 diabetes (T2D) since 1998. It was the first medication that demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in obese subjects with T2D. Efficacy and safety of metformin have since been demonstrated in further studies and in real-world data on its use in practice. The recommendation of metformin as baseline therapy has reached wide acceptance internationally. During the period 2015-2021, large cardiovascular safety trials showed superiority for cardiovascular morbidity and partly also mortality outcomes for most substances of the novel antidiabetic substance classes of GLP‑1 receptor agonists and SGLT‑2 inhibitors in people with T2D and very high cardiovascular risk or preexisting cardiovascular disease. The evidence for these two substance classes is now broader than for metformin. Therefore, the question arises as to whether it is still justified to recommend metformin generally as first-line therapy in T2D. This article provides an overview of the study data as well as an overview of the evidence-based guidelines. The status and position of metformin in the treatment of T2D are discussed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsMetforminCardiovascular DiseasesHumansSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCardiovascular comorbidityDrug therapy, combinationGlucagon-like peptide‑1 receptor agonistsHypoglycemic agents, oralSodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.