Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39168913›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

Collaborating with non-radiological clinical colleagues.

Maria Raissaki, Samuel Stafrace, Androniki Kozana, Rutger A J Nievelstein, Georgia Papaioannou

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria RaissakiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Stavrakia Medical School Campus, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. mraissaki@yahoo.gr.ORCID 0000-0001-5281-475X
Samuel StafraceDepartment of Radiology, McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-5311
Androniki KozanaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-8561
Rutger A J NievelsteinDivision Imaging & Oncology, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht/Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-1486
Georgia PapaioannouDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Mitera Maternal and Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-4653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paediatric radiology is a challenging and intriguing subspecialty, dealing with children, guardians and non-radiological clinical colleagues. Paediatric radiologists are routinely in contact with numerous paediatric and surgical subspecialties, all having different needs, perceptions, prioritisations and expectations. Moreover, the radiologist is part of the team of radiographers, sonographers, nurses and secretaries, assisted by appropriate equipment and electronic tools. The framework of good collaboration to ensure safety and effectiveness for the imaged child is a shared responsibility among all medical practitioners involved. Communication in routine practice has many forms and includes appropriately filled radiology requests in accordance to the patient's medical records, routine and timely production of structured, problem-solving radiology reports, face-to-face or electronic-assisted communications and discussions on a pre-defined framework, mutually-agreed and evidence-based protocols adjusted to local availability, skills and national and international guidelines. Mutual understanding of advantages and limitations of imaging is paramount. Well-meant discussions, professionalism and empathy should promote soft skills, bidirectional communication and good collaboration for the benefit of added-value paediatric radiology. International societies, health authorities, medical directors and senior consultants have the responsibility to suggest and safeguard frameworks and recommendations. Regular multidisciplinary meetings and multidisciplinary research projects under openness, honesty and transparency are pathways favouring good collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPediatricsRadiologyChildHumansCommunicationEmpathyIntersectoral collaborationPaediatricsRadiologySafety

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.