Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39169044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Unraveling druggable cancer-driving proteins and targeted drugs using artificial intelligence and multi-omics analyses.

Andrés López-Cortés, Alejandro Cabrera-Andrade, Gabriela Echeverría-Garcés, Paulina Echeverría-Espinoza, Micaela Pineda-Albán, Nicole Elsitdie, José Bueno-Miño, Carlos M Cruz-Segundo, Julian Dorado, Alejandro Pazos and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrés López-CortésCancer Research Group (CRG), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador. aalc84@gmail.com.
Alejandro Cabrera-AndradeGrupo de Bio-Quimioinformática, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Gabriela Echeverría-GarcésCentro de Referencia Nacional de Genómica, Secuenciación y Bioinformática, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública "Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez", Quito, Ecuador.
Paulina Echeverría-EspinozaCancer Research Group (CRG), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Micaela Pineda-AlbánCancer Research Group (CRG), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Nicole ElsitdieCancer Research Group (CRG), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
José Bueno-MiñoCancer Research Group (CRG), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Carlos M Cruz-SegundoRNASA-IMEDIR, Computer Science Faculty, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.
Julian DoradoRNASA-IMEDIR, Computer Science Faculty, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.
Alejandro PazosRNASA-IMEDIR, Computer Science Faculty, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.
Humberto Gonzáles-DíazDepartment of Organic Chemistry II, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Biscay, Spain.
Yunierkis Pérez-CastilloGrupo de Bio-Quimioinformática, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Eduardo TejeraGrupo de Bio-Quimioinformática, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.
Cristian R MunteanuRNASA-IMEDIR, Computer Science Faculty, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The druggable proteome refers to proteins that can bind to small molecules with appropriate chemical affinity, inducing a favorable clinical response. Predicting druggable proteins through screening and in silico modeling is imperative for drug design. To contribute to this field, we developed an accurate predictive classifier for druggable cancer-driving proteins using amino acid composition descriptors of protein sequences and 13 machine learning linear and non-linear classifiers. The optimal classifier was achieved with the support vector machine method, utilizing 200 tri-amino acid composition descriptors. The high performance of the model is evident from an area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) of 0.975 ± 0.003 and an accuracy of 0.929 ± 0.006 (threefold cross-validation). The machine learning prediction model was enhanced with multi-omics approaches, including the target-disease evidence score, the shortest pathways to cancer hallmarks, structure-based ligandability assessment, unfavorable prognostic protein analysis, and the oncogenic variome. Additionally, we performed a drug repurposing analysis to identify drugs with the highest affinity capable of targeting the best predicted proteins. As a result, we identified 79 key druggable cancer-driving proteins with the highest ligandability, and 23 of them demonstrated unfavorable prognostic significance across 16 TCGA PanCancer types: CDKN2A, BCL10, ACVR1, CASP8, JAG1, TSC1, NBN, PREX2, PPP2R1A, DNM2, VAV1, ASXL1, TPR, HRAS, BUB1B, ATG7, MARK3, SETD2, CCNE1, MUTYH, CDKN2C, RB1, and SMARCA4. Moreover, we prioritized 11 clinically relevant drugs targeting these proteins. This strategy effectively predicts and prioritizes biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and drugs for in-depth studies in clinical trials. Scripts are available at https://github.com/muntisa/machine-learning-for-druggable-proteins .

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsComputational BiologyDrug RepositioningHumansMachine LearningMultiomicsNeoplasm ProteinsSupport Vector MachineAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39169044
PMCPMC11339426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.