ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024
Retinal inputs that drive optomotor responses of mice under mesopic conditions.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optomotor responses are a popular way to assess sub-cortical visual responses in mice. We studied photoreceptor inputs into optomotor circuits using genetically-modified mice lacking the exocytotic calcium sensors synaptotagmin 1 (Syt1) and 7 (Syt7) in rods or cones. We also tested mice that in which cone transducin, GNAT2, had been eliminated. We studied spatial frequency sensitivity under mesopic conditions by varying the spatial frequency of a grating rotating at 12 deg/s and contrast sensitivity by varying luminance contrast of 0.2c/deg gratings. We found that eliminating Syt1 from rods reduced responses to a low spatial frequency grating (0.05c/deg) consistent with low resolution in this pathway. Conversely, eliminating the ability of cones to respond to light (by eliminating GNAT2) or transmit light responses (by selectively eliminating Syt1) showed weaker responses to a high spatial frequency grating (3c/deg). Eliminating Syt7 from the entire optomotor pathway in a global knockout had no significant effect on optomotor responses. We isolated the secondary rod pathway involving transmission of rod responses to cones via gap junctions by simultaneously eliminating Syt1 from rods and GNAT2 from cones. We found that the secondary rod pathway is sufficient to drive robust optomotor responses under mesopic conditions. Finally, eliminating Syt1 from both rods and cones almost completely abolished optomotor responses, but we detected weak responses to large, bright rotating gratings that are likely driven by input from intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.