ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of a prognostic model for ovarian cancer based on a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of cuproptosis-associated long non-coding RNA signatures.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Big data analysis and machine learning of the role of cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (CuLncs) in the prognosis and immune landscape of ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Characterization of Cuproptosis-Related LncRNAs Prognostic Signature and Identification of LINC02285 as a Novel Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OCa) is a common malignancy in women, and the role of cuproptosis and its related genes in OCa is unclear. Using the GSE14407 dataset, we analyzed the expression and correlation of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) between tumor and normal groups. From the TCGA-OV dataset, we identified 20 cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (CuLncs) associated with patient survival through univariate Cox analysis. OCa patients were divided into early-stage and late-stage groups to analyze CuLncs expression. Cluster analysis classified patients into two clusters, with Cluster1 having a poorer prognosis. Significant differences in "Lymphatic Invasion" and "Cancer status" were observed between clusters. Seven CRGs showed significant expression differences, validated using the human protein atlas (HPA) databases. Immune analysis revealed a higher ImmuneScore in Cluster1. GSEA identified associated signaling pathways. LASSO regression included 11 CuLncs to construct and validate a survival prediction model, classifying patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Correlations between riskScore, Cluster phenotype, ImmuneScore, and immune cell infiltration were explored. Cell experiments showed that knocking down AC023644.1 decreases OCa cell viability. In conclusion, we constructed an accurate prognostic model for OCa based on 11 CuLncs, providing a basis for prognosis assessment and potential immunotherapy targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.