Evidence mapPaperPMID 39170371Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Comorbidities and mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with congestive heart failure: A comprehensive analysis.

Yi Liu, Dengao Li, Yuchen Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi LiuCollege of Electronic Information and Optical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China.
Dengao LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China.
Yuchen LiangShanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, 030027, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems, resulting in alarming incidence and mortality rates among patients with comorbidities, including heart failure. Understanding the characteristics of heart failure and other comorbidities during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial for effective prevention and treatment. However, the current understanding of these characteristics among different racial groups remains incomplete. In this study, we investigated a cohort of 4711 patients, classifying them into congestive heart failure (CHF) and non-CHF groups. Biomarker analysis revealed noteworthy variations in blood urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase, and white blood cell levels based on the presence or absence of CHF. Stratified by three racial groups, univariate logistic regression analysis identified significant differences in multiple variables, including CHF. Subsequent univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated variations in mortality factors among distinct populations, with age and comorbidity playing prominent roles. This study utilized a large-scale database to investigate the characteristics of heart failure and related variables during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings revealed distinctive mortality risk factors among various racial groups, emphasizing the significance of customized risk assessment and management approaches for diverse populations. These findings also provide a valuable resource for the development of targeted interventions and the promotion of equitable healthcare outcomes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

ComorbiditiesCongestive heart failureCOVID-19MortalityRacial groupsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39170371
PMCPMC11336877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.