Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Indications and adverse events of teriparatide: based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Ming-Tao Wen, Jia-Cheng Li, Bo-Wen Lu, Hua-Rong Shao, Pei-Xue Ling, Fei Liu, Gang Li, Di Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ming-Tao Wen *The First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Jia-Cheng Li *The First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Bo-Wen LuThe First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Hua-Rong ShaoShandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Science, Key Laboratory of Biopharmaceuticals, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Pei-Xue LingShandong Academy of Pharmaceutical Science, Key Laboratory of Biopharmaceuticals, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Fei LiuThe First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Gang LiThe First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.
Di LuoThe First Clinical Medical School, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Teriparatide is approved for osteoporosis. Post-marketing surveillance is critical given its widespread use. Objective: To investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with teriparatide using the FAERS database, compare association strengths for key AEs, and explore potential applications to provide clinical reference. Methods: FAERS data from 2004 to 2023 were analyzed. Reports where teriparatide was the primary suspect drug were included. Adverse events were mapped to System Organ Classes and Preferred Terms. Disproportionality analysis using ROR, PRR, BCPNN and EBGM algorithms was conducted to detect safety signals. Results: Out of 107,123 reports with teriparatide as the primary suspect, key AEs identified included pain in extremity (PRR: 4.54), muscle spasms (PRR: 5.11), fractures (PRR range: 17.67-552.95), and increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73). Teriparatide exhibited a stronger association with increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73) compared to fractures (PRR range: 17.67-552.95). Notably, only 10.86% of AE reports were submitted by physicians and another 10% by other health professionals. Subset analyses showed a higher consistency of reported AEs from health professionals compared to the general dataset. Off-label uses were noted in conditions such as arthritis (0.57%) and cancer (0.12%). For osteoporosis, main AEs were pain (18.2%), fractures (12.4%), muscle spasms (7.7%), and nausea (6.5%), while glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis AEs included fractures (24.1%), pain (13.2%), decreased bone density (9.8%), and nausea (5.1%). Conclusion: Our findings provide real-world safety data on teriparatide, revealing key AEs and their association strengths. The low proportion of reports by healthcare professionals suggests the need for cautious interpretation. Continuous vigilance and further research are imperative to guide teriparatide's clinical use.

Indexed as

adverse eventsFAERSosteoporosispharmacovigilanceteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID39170708
PMCPMC11335658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.