Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170877›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2024

Racial Disparities in Pulse Oximetry, in COVID-19 and ICU Settings.

Carmen A T Reep, Lucas M Fleuren, Leo Heunks, Evert-Jan Wils

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carmen A T ReepDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lucas M FleurenDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Leo HeunksDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Evert-Jan WilsDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-0920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the impact of race on pulse oximetry reliability, taking into account Spo

designRetrospective cohort study covering admissions from January 2020 to April 2024.

settingNational COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database, consisting of electronic health records from 80 U.S. institutions. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: Patients were selected from the N3C database based on the availability of data on self-identified race and both pulse oximetry estimated Spo

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe agreement between Spo

conclusionsRace significantly impacts pulse oximetry reliability. Not only Black and Hispanic or Latino patients were at higher risk for hidden hypoxemia, but also those admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Future in-depth explorations into the underlying causes and potential solutions are needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare DisparitiesIntensive Care UnitsOximetryAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39170877
PMCPMC11338246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.