Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170931›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2024

Kidney transplantation and gut microbiota.

Zehuan Chen, Xinhua Chang, Qianyu Ye, Yifang Gao, Ronghai Deng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dietary Guidelines Post Kidney Transplant: Is This the Missing Link in Recovery and Graft Survival?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zehuan ChenOrgan Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2390-9835
Xinhua ChangOrgan Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital.
Qianyu YeOrgan Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital.
Yifang GaoOrgan Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital.
Ronghai DengOrgan Transplantation Center, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-2311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is an effective way to improve the condition of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, maintaining long-term graft function and improving patient survival remain a key challenge after kidney transplantation. Dysbiosis of intestinal flora has been reported to be associated with complications in renal transplant recipients. The commensal microbiota plays an important role in the immunomodulation of the transplant recipient responses. However, several processes, such as the use of perioperative antibiotics and high-dose immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients, can lead to gut dysbiosis and disrupt the interaction between the microbiota and the host immune responses, which in turn can lead to complications such as infection and rejection in organ recipients. In this review, we summarize and discuss the changes in intestinal flora and their influencing factors in patients after renal transplantation as well as the evidence related to the impact of intestinal dysbiosis on the prognosis of renal transplantation from

Indexed as

gut dysbiosisimmunosuppressionkidney transplantationmicrobial therapy

Identifiers

PMID39170931
PMCPMC11336673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.