Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39170937›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Treatment adherence and clinical outcomes amongst in people with drug-susceptible tuberculosis using medication monitor and differentiated care approach compared with standard of care in South Africa: a cluster randomized trial.

Salome Charalambous, Noriah Maraba, Lauren Jennings, Israel Rabothata, Dolphina Cogill, Rachel Mukora, Piotr Hippner, Pren Naidoo, Nokhanyo Xaba, Lihle Mchunu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Salome CharalambousThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Noriah MarabaThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Lauren JenningsDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine & Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Israel RabothataThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Dolphina CogillDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine & Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Rachel MukoraThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Piotr HippnerThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Pren NaidooInteractive Research and Development, Durban 4001, South Africa.
Nokhanyo XabaInteractive Research and Development, Durban 4001, South Africa.
Lihle MchunuThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Kavindhran VelenThe Aurum Institute, Aurum House, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Catherine OrrellDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine & Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Katherine L FieldingLondon School of Hygiene and & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor treatment adherence contributes to lower treatment completion and higher loss to follow-up among people with tuberculosis (PWTB). Medication monitors have shown some evidence of improved adherence. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomised trial in 18 primary health clinics in South Africa between May 2019-February 2022. Persons (aged ≥ 2 years) with drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB) were enrolled. All participants were provided with monitors which were silent in the standard of care (SoC) arm. In the intevention arm, weekly adherence reports were reviewed and participants received intensified support as appropriate (text, phone call, home visit, motivational counselling). The primary outcome was adherence, which was calculated as days box was opened (proxy for drug taken)/total expected treatment days as a binary variable (<80% versus ≥80%). Analysis took into account clustered design. The trial was registered with the Pan African Trial Registry PACTR20190268115772. Findings: We enrolled 2727 participants (38% women, median age 36 (IQR 27-45 years), of whom 2584 had available adherence data. The primary outcome (measured as ≥80% adherence) was higher in intervention versus SoC arm (81.0% versus 50.8%, adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.51 (1.36-1.66). Similarly, overall percentage adherence was higher in intervention versus SoC arm (88.5% versus 69.7%, adjusted risk difference 16.8% (13.3%-20.4%)). Interpretation: People with DS-TB had improved treatment adherence in the intervention arm. We believe the effect on adherence is important and warrants continued use and evaluation of these technologies. Funding: The study is funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Uinted States, the Stop TB Partnership, Switzerland, and the South African Medical Research Council, South Africa.

Indexed as

AdherenceDifferentiated care approachMedication monitorsRecurrenceTreatment outcomesTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39170937
PMCPMC11338121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.