ReviewCureus2024
Geriatric Trauma: Identifying Research Gaps and Opportunities for Improvement.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracic injuries in elderly trauma patients epidemiology, injury characteristics, in-hospital care and outcome.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolomics Reveals Glyoxylate and Dicarboxylate Metabolism Disorder in Elderly Trauma: A Retrospective Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geriatric trauma is a critical area of research owing to the increasing elderly population and the unique challenges associated with their injuries. This study aimed to explore the intellectual structure, growth, spatial analysis, seminal publications, most frequent keywords, trending topics, conceptual structure, and thematic evolution of geriatric trauma research (GTR). A comprehensive analysis was conducted using VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands) and Biblioshiny (K-Synth Srl, University of Naples Federico II, Italy) to examine a corpus of scholarly publications (N = 682) related to GTR (2004-2024). Bibliographic data were collected from the Scopus database and analyzed to highlight the key findings and trends. The analysis revealed the leading contributors to GTR. Over the years, there has been an increased interest in geriatric trauma, as demonstrated by the increasing trend in research publications. Collaboration patterns among nations were determined through spatial analysis, and insights into significant topics and their influence were offered by influential publications. Keywords used frequently as well as current issues formed part of this study's findings, which give insight into what was most focused on within the GTR. Themes and their development over time were made explicit by revealing their conceptual structures and thematic evolutions. GTR has increased significantly. Interdisciplinary approaches are suggested for future research. Furthermore, gaps need to be addressed using technological advancements that will help improve geriatric trauma management and lead to better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.