ReviewEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets2025
Mendelian Randomization Studies: Opening a New Window in the Study of Metabolic Diseases and Chronic Kidney Disease.
Review in Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically Predicted 12,13-DiHOME Mediates the Association between TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand and Immune Thrombocytopenia.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Microbiota-mitochondria axis in neurodegenerative disorders and retinal dysfunction: mechanisms and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Benefits of Cilostazol's Effect on Vascular and Neuropathic Complications Caused by Diabetes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is widely recognized that a strong correlation exists between metabolic diseases and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Based on bibliometric statistics, the overall number of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis in relation to metabolic diseases and CKD has increased since 2005. In recent years, this topic has emerged as a significant area of research interest. In clinical studies, RCTs are often limited due to the intricate causal interplay between metabolic diseases and CKD, which makes it difficult to ascertain the precise etiology of these conditions definitively. In MR studies, genetic variation is incorporated as an instrumental variable (IV). They elucidate the possible causal relationships between associated risk factors and disease risks by including individual innate genetic markers. It is widely believed that MR avoids confounding and can reverse effects to the greatest extent possible. As an increasingly popular technology in the medical field, MR studies have become a popular technology in causal relationships investigation, particularly in epidemiological etiology studies. At present, MR has been widely used for the investigation of medical etiologies, drug development, and decision-making in public health. The article aims to offer insights into the causal relationship between metabolic diseases and CKD, as well as strategies for prevention and treatment, through a summary of MR-related research on these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39171476What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.