ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2024
Interpretable machine learning models based on shear-wave elastography radiomics for predicting cardiovascular disease in diabetic kidney disease patients.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning models based on CMR radiomics for predicting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
- Multi-Modality Ultrasound Model for Renal Fibrosis Assessment in Chronic Kidney Disease: Integrating Grayscale and Color Doppler Ultrasound Radiomics with Shear Wave Elastography.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of cardiovascular complications is significantly elevated in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Recognizing the link between the progression of DKD and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is crucial to focus on the early prediction and management of CVD risk factors among these patients to potentially enhance their health outcomes.
objectiveThis study sought to bridge the existing gap by developing and validating machine learning (ML) models that utilize clinical data and shear wave elastography (SWE) radiomics features to identify patients at risk of CVD, ultimately aiming to improve the management of DKD. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study conducted a retrospective analysis of 586 patients with DKD, dividing them into training and external validation cohorts. We categorized patients based on the presence or absence of CVD. Utilizing SWE imaging, we extracted and standardized radiomics features to develop multiple ML models. These models underwent internal validation using radiomics features alone, clinical data, or a combination thereof. The optimal model was then identified, and its feature importance was assessed through the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method, before proceeding to external validation.
resultsAmong the 586 patients analyzed, 30.7% (180/586) were identified as at risk for CVD. The study pinpointed six significant radiomics features related to CVD, alongside six critical pieces of clinical data. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model outperformed others in both internal and external validations. Further, SHAP analysis highlighted five principal determinants of CVD risk, comprising three clinical indicators and two SWE radiomics features.
conclusionsThis study highlights the effectiveness of an SVM model that combines clinical and radiomics features in predicting CVD risk among DKD patients. It enables early prediction of CVD in this patient group, thereby supporting the implementation of timely and suitable interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.