Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39171859›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

A prediction model based on deep learning and radiomics features of DWI for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.

Jing Wang, Pujiao Song, Meng Zhang, Wei Liu, Xi Zeng, Nanshan Chen, Yuxia Li, Minghua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0937-6456
Pujiao SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Xi ZengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Nanshan ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Yuxia LiDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Minghua WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.

Funding

Cultivation Project of Guizhou Province for Young Talents in Science and Education (2012)173the Key Project of Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Project 2018020367the Key Project of Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Project LHGJ20220627Youth Cultivation Fund Program of Xinxiang Medical University First Affiliated Hospital QN-2022-B11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the efficacy of a prediction model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features extracted from deep learning (DL) and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to identify microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC).

methodsThis study included a cohort of 116 patients with EC, who were subsequently divided into training (n = 81) and test (n = 35) sets. From DWI, conventional radiomics features and convolutional neural network-based DL features were extracted. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression were adopted as classifiers. DL features, radiomics features, clinical variables, ADC values, and their combinations were applied to establish DL, radiomics, clinical, ADC, and combined models, respectively. The predictive performance was evaluated through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), total integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe optimal predictive model, based on an RF classifier, comprised four DL features, three radiomics features, two clinical variables, and an ADC value. In the training and test sets, this model exhibited AUC values of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.935-1.000) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.731-0.967), respectively, demonstrating different degrees of improvement compared with the clinical, DL, radiomics, and ADC models (AUC-training = 0.671, 0.873, 0.833, and 0.814, AUC-test = 0.685, 0.783, 0.708, and 0.713, respectively). The NRI and IDI analyses revealed that the combined model resulted in improved risk reclassification of the MSI status compared to the clinical, radiomics, DL, and ADC models. The calibration curves and DCA indicated good consistency and clinical utility of this model, respectively.

conclusionsThe predictive model based on DWI features extracted from DL and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and ADC values could effectively assess the MSI status in EC.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEndometrial NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityRadiomicsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC Curvedeep learningdiffusion‐weighted imagingendometrial cancermicrosatellite instabilityradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39171859
PMCPMC11339853

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.