SynthesisSleep medicine2024
Efficacy and safety of TOMAC for treatment of medication-naïve and medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: A randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sleep medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuromodulation for Restless Legs Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Mechanistic Considerations for Spinal Cord Stimulation.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Pooled it
- Observational
- The evolving treatment landscape of restless legs syndrome.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Acute effects of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) on sleep in adults with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Strategies for the Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/
backgroundThere is a significant unmet need for safe and effective nonpharmacological therapies for restless legs syndrome (RLS). The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with RLS. PATIENTS/
methodsA multicenter, randomized, participant-blinded, sham-controlled trial enrolled 45 adults with primary moderate-to-severe RLS who were either medication-naïve (n = 20) or medication-refractory (n = 25). Participants were 1:1 randomized to TOMAC (n = 22) or sham (n = 23) for two weeks and instructed to self-administer 30-min TOMAC sessions when they experienced RLS symptoms. The primary outcome was mean change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) total score. A subsequent meta-analysis included the present trial and a previous randomized clinical trial that enrolled medication-naïve RLS patients.
resultsIRLS reduction was significantly greater for TOMAC than sham (TOMAC -6.59 vs. sham -2.17; mean difference (MD) = -4.42; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -1.57 to -7.26; p = 0.0040). Subgroup analysis showed similar IRLS mean difference for medication-refractory (MD = -4.50; p = 0.02) and medication-naïve (MD = -4.40; p = 0.08) cohorts, which was significantly different from sham only for the medication-refractory cohort. Meta-analysis of combined data from 33 medication-naïve RLS patients showed a significant reduction in mean IRLS score after two weeks for TOMAC compared to sham (MD = -4.30; 95 % CI -1.36 to -7.24; p = 0.004).
conclusionsThe present trial confirmed previous reports documenting efficacy and safety of TOMAC in refractory RLS and indicated similar effect sizes in refractory versus naïve subgroups. The meta-analysis demonstrated that TOMAC significantly improves RLS symptoms in naïve participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.